LoganLibraryLogo Logan Library

Reviews
Book Reviews by Reading Program Participants

by Michael N Nagler

Write Your Own Review

I ended up writing a more formal review of this book for the Secular Buddhist Association. Here's a link and a rough version of what went into that one: http:// secularbuddhism.org/ 2016/02/29/ the-nonviolence-handbook-a-review/ You know those little games people like to post as their Facebook statuses? Well, last week, this one: [image] Led me to The Nonviolence Handbook& with a chainsaw. Apparently, things either got out of control quickly or The Nonviolence Handbook is very into ice sculpture. Jokes aside, for those who have not looked at the details of what nonviolence (ahimsa) can be and how it can be lived / its techniques applied on both the grand and interpersonal scales, this guide is incredibly thorough in relatively few pages. For those who have already read some of Naglers other works (including his Metta Center for Nonviolence website), youll find that the book tends to just repeat what Nagler already says for free (which isnt necessarily a bad thing). After a general overview, Nagler describes the importance of having Right Intention and Right Means when aiming to engage in nonviolent direct action. Being among those who have previously read his website, I was surprised to hear such Buddhism-evoking terminology. When I last looked at Naglers work, aside from having metta in the name of his nonprofit, there was not much direct reference to any kind of Buddhism. Now, however, there seems to not just be terminology and symbols on his website (e.g. theres now an image of Gautama Buddha on the landing page), but a deeper integration of seminal Buddhist ideas in his conceptions of nonviolent action. Right Intention includes recognizing the interconnectedness (i.e. dependent arising) and fundamental sameness (which can be evoked through the concept of sunyata) of all people and using this as a logical springboard into minimizing harm to all involved in a conflict (i.e. the First Precept) by the respecting of everyones humanity and pride in a conflict (including yourself and your enemies). It also includes various suggestions on how to develop mind states and habits that encourage such an outlook. While he mentions avoiding all media, which I dont think is necessary and I honestly kind of roll my eyes at, he also mentions - you guessed it - meditation, which he emphasizes need not be religious. He does not mention metta meditation by name, but its clear that that specific style of meditation would encourage his Right Intention and he knows that enough to even add metta to the name of his nonprofit. Right Means seems to be a longer (and less systematic, in my honest opinion) statement of his Six Principles of Nonviolence: Respect everyone Always include Constructive Program Look at the long term Look for win-win solutions Use power carefully (i.e. dont gloat when you win) Study the history of nonviolence For those who arent familiar with the term/ philosophy of Satyagraha, and especially for those who forget about or neglect the element of constructive program (building a better replacement for whatever structure you are fighting so that theres not a vacuum of services after success), this section will be extremely thought-provoking and transformative. Next (and also throughout) he addresses some common questions or concerns about nonviolence: Nonviolence should not be passive. It should be constructive (i.e. constructive program, or building a better system to replace the existing one) and directly obstructive (i.e. there should be direct action). Its not a last resort or the technique of the weak; it is a lifestyle of the strong. What about when nonviolence doesnt seem to be working? What to do after a victory? How many people do you need to have an effective nonviolent movement? How important are symbols or symbolic acts? Is suffering necessary for anyone who attempts nonviolence? (This leads to a discussion which would fit quite well in any larger talk on dukkha.) Can nonviolence ever be misused? Overall, I think he does an excellent job of addressing these questions (using real life examples), and I feel that I learned a thing or two despite being already familiar with this topic and Naglers thoughts on it. I did think of (and was, unfortunately, left with) one question that I invite anyone reading this to weigh in on in the comments: [paraphrasing] People engaging in nonviolent direct action should prepare themselves for some dukkha and even to die for their cause. However, what should one do when its not ones own life that is threatened, but that of a loved one? Is it even ethical to risk the suffering and life of another without their consent and not your own? The book wraps up by emphasizing that it is best / most effective to control your anger or channel it into nonviolent direct action instead of just screaming as much as you can no matter what (a complaint I often have about online-only activists). Also, nonviolence should be a lifestyle and not just a set of tactics (which is very inline with Buddhist thinking). Finally, there is also a whole chapter of just quotable quotes from the book (and to be fair, there are many) and information on Naglers background (which is pretty impressive). Again, the book is extremely thought-provoking and informative in relatively few pages. It is not just some outline of philosophy - it is a guide on actual practical action (living up to its subtitle). While it does tend to focus on grand movements, its noteworthy that many of the ideas and practices it covers can apply to interpersonal conflicts. I have used these practices for some of my own personal struggles with great success (and recently gotten so reactive that I didnt use them for this one conflict and ended up regretting how hurtfully I responded), so I can personally vouch for their real-world effectiveness. While it does kind of rehash ideas that can be found on Naglers website and while Nagler does sometimes come off as New Age-y or even cult-ish (e.g. the cut yourself off from the media bit), overall, this book is still worth getting and surprisingly not only in line with general Buddhist principles, but supportive of Secular Buddhist principles and practices. (As a matter of fact, I was genuinely surprised at how much this book relates specifically to Secular Buddhism, and it inspired me to write this review for SBA.) Anyone who is interested in potential (Secular) Buddhist ethics, conflict resolution, nonviolent communication, forgiveness, or just in a topic that they havent explored much - will get a lot out of this book. Even if none of those categories apply to you, theres still many new ways of thinking presented, so that anyone can get something out of The Nonviolence Handbook: A Guide for Practical Action. Buy it today (or read 75% of it at the Metta Center for Nonviolence website, lol~!)
Reviewed by Mizanthropist